
The US Federal Reserve (Fed) raised interest rates in September after a three-year gap. The move to contain alarming inflation figures has revived concerns that tighter liquidity could weigh on Bitcoin (BTC), echoing the 2022 bear market.
Behind those inflation concerns is a rise in Brent Oil prices following the US-Iran war, which began on February 28. The conflict continues to disrupt shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, directly influencing global markets and investor sentiment.
Rising inflation forces the Fed to increase interest rates, draining market liquidity and dampening demand among consumers and producers alike. Investors consequently become less willing to take risks, putting pressure on equities, crypto and other high-risk assets.

Markets have largely priced in the war. However, the prospect of further Fed rate increases resembling the 2022 cycle leaves an open question: could Bitcoin enter another bear cycle?
A repeat of Bitcoin’s 2022 bear market is troubling the broader market. During that period, Brent Crude Oil climbed above $130 per barrel, leading the Fed to increase the fed funds rate over several months.
On September 16, the US Fed was forced to deliver its first interest-rate increase in three years, lifting rates by a quarter point and fuelling market unease. That took the fed funds target range to 3.75% to 4.00%. September’s US Consumer Price Index (CPI) reached 3.7% YoY, compared with 3.4% in August, as monthly inflation quickened to 0.6%.
The Fed subsequently left its benchmark rate on hold on October 28. However, the 10-2 decision implied that additional increases were ahead. If price pressures persist, financial conditions could remain restrictive, leaving less capital available for speculative assets.
Bitcoin’s relationship with rate increases was far from straightforward during the 2022-23 cycle. As the Fed lifted rates from near zero to 4.25%–4.50%, BTC slid nearly 78%, from about $69,000 in November 2021 to approximately $15,476 in November 2022.
Monetary tightening gathered pace in 2022 through four consecutive 75-basis-point increases, bookended by three smaller hikes. Selling pressure intensified as those increases coincided with the collapse of the Terra ecosystem, failures among crypto lenders and the FTX bankruptcy case.
During 2023, however, Bitcoin rebounded despite further, slower-paced Fed rate increases that ultimately took rates to 5.25%–5.50% in July. That rebound illustrates how expectations, market positioning and demand can carry more weight than the immediate effects of higher rates.

Spot Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) and corporate BTC treasuries have become significant channels for institutional demand, giving Bitcoin a different market structure in 2026 from that of the 2022 bear market. As FXStreet previously reported, Bitcoin’s four-year cycle points towards a bullish reversal ahead in 2026.
Total net flows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs stand at $104.9 billion as of October 28. Since their January 2024 inception, the funds have registered 22 months of inflows and 11 months of outflows. Private companies hold $103.7 billion in Bitcoin, while public companies hold $22.8 billion. These sizeable ETF and corporate holdings underpin demand, with some purchases funded by equity issuance, debt or preferred securities.
A sustained Bitcoin correction could nevertheless erode these holdings, as illustrated by Strategy’s recent sale of some BTC to build cash reserves. Should another series of rate increases constrain institutional liquidity, accumulation could slow, or these holdings could become a source of supply.


With broader market conditions still uncertain, I spoke exclusively to Dovile Silenskyte, Director of Digital Assets Research at WisdomTree, for FXStreet and asked for his outlook on Bitcoin.
Demand now reaches Bitcoin through different routes, distinguishing this cycle from earlier ones. Corporate balance sheets, established investment portfolios and sovereign strategies provide channels that could improve its ability to withstand macroeconomic pressure.
Investors can use familiar market infrastructure to allocate capital through spot ETFs. Longer-term strategic demand can come from corporate treasuries, while sovereign holdings could lessen potential selling pressure if they are retained. With Bitcoin’s supply limited, persistent buying and holding through these routes could underpin prices, despite interest-rate uncertainty and geopolitical tensions dampening risk appetite.
Cyclical risks remain despite that structural support. Corporate purchases still depend on financing conditions, and ETF flows can turn negative. Expanding Bitcoin’s investor base creates more potential demand channels when sentiment recovers, but it does not establish a price floor.
A bottom in late 2026 should therefore be treated as a possible scenario rather than a reliable forecast. Institutional adoption [combined] with improving global liquidity offers a stronger foundation for the bullish case. Lower real yields and easier monetary conditions could allow Bitcoin to draw support from both structural demand and a more favourable macroeconomic backdrop.
Competition for capital between AI investment and Bitcoin is possible in the short term. Their expansion is not necessarily mutually exclusive, however: investors can finance the AI buildout and raise their Bitcoin exposure at the same time.
Financing conditions present the most immediate risk. If investor demand cannot keep pace with debt supply, substantial borrowing for AI infrastructure could lift financing costs. Still, increased issuance does not inevitably tighten financial conditions, since the proceeds support investment and circulate through the economy. The key questions are whether markets can absorb that debt and whether project returns justify the borrowing.
Productivity gains represent the more substantial longer-term opportunity. By improving efficiency, AI could raise output and moderate inflationary pressure, creating a more favourable investment environment that also benefits Bitcoin. This is a plausible scenario, not an assured return from AI expenditure.
Different fundamentals also underpin Bitcoin’s investment case. Rather than providing exposure to corporate profits or an issuer’s debt-repayment capacity, it gives investors access to a scarce digital asset. Its attraction thus reaches beyond the technology spending cycle.
Despite the broader market uncertainty, Bitcoin remains resilient above key support levels, offering a counterpoint to an entirely bearish assessment. Institutional demand distinguishes the next potential rate-hike cycle from earlier ones and could underpin a sustainable move higher.
That said, these funds may struggle to provide support through an extended period of rate increases. Markets anticipate another 25-basis-point rise before the end of 2026.
Whether Bitcoin’s institutionalisation can absorb the next liquidity shock without a repeat of previous cycles’ extreme drawdowns will therefore be the decisive test.